<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Process diagnostic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oraclue.com/2009/07/01/process-diagnostic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oraclue.com/2009/07/01/process-diagnostic/</link>
	<description>Oracle internals, debugging and undocumented features</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 15:44:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: oraclue</title>
		<link>http://oraclue.com/2009/07/01/process-diagnostic/#comment-234</link>
		<dc:creator>oraclue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oraclue.com/?p=827#comment-234</guid>
		<description>Version 11.1.0.7  x86-64
I saw some metalink notes using level 266 ( I am not sure but I think LTOM is using it ).

This command is just another option.My rule is always test before doing anything.

I did not see any metalink or other references about unit test.It is my own research.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Version 11.1.0.7  x86-64<br />
I saw some metalink notes using level 266 ( I am not sure but I think LTOM is using it ).</p>
<p>This command is just another option.My rule is always test before doing anything.</p>
<p>I did not see any metalink or other references about unit test.It is my own research.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tanel Poder</title>
		<link>http://oraclue.com/2009/07/01/process-diagnostic/#comment-233</link>
		<dc:creator>Tanel Poder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oraclue.com/?p=827#comment-233</guid>
		<description>Which version did you run the tests? In 10.2 the processstate dump level 10 dumps the session wait history too. 

Btw, if you set the bit 0x100 in the dump level (like level 266) then you will get short stack dumps too.

I like the level 266 approach more as I&#039;ve seen this recommended and used in metalink notes, I don&#039;t think it would be safe to run undocumented unit test kernel functions in production... Or have you seen any metalink notes about this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which version did you run the tests? In 10.2 the processstate dump level 10 dumps the session wait history too. </p>
<p>Btw, if you set the bit 0&#215;100 in the dump level (like level 266) then you will get short stack dumps too.</p>
<p>I like the level 266 approach more as I&#8217;ve seen this recommended and used in metalink notes, I don&#8217;t think it would be safe to run undocumented unit test kernel functions in production&#8230; Or have you seen any metalink notes about this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blogroll Report 26/06/2009 – 03/07/2006 &#171; Coskan&#8217;s Approach to Oracle</title>
		<link>http://oraclue.com/2009/07/01/process-diagnostic/#comment-232</link>
		<dc:creator>Blogroll Report 26/06/2009 – 03/07/2006 &#171; Coskan&#8217;s Approach to Oracle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 15:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oraclue.com/?p=827#comment-232</guid>
		<description>[...] Miladin Madrakovic &#8211; Process diagnostic [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Miladin Madrakovic &#8211; Process diagnostic [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
